Time-driven Activity-based Costing Analysis Research Articles

Cost of treating rheumatoid arthritis in the primary care public health system in Ireland: A time-driven activity-based cost analysis

BackgroundChronic diseases are at epidemic proportions and continuing to increase in both incidence and prevalence globally. Therefore, there is a growing need to assess and improve on the value currently provided within chronic care pathways. Examining the costs associated with care pathways is a critical part of assessing this value in order to better understand and introduce potential cost-saving interventions. ObjectivesExamining one such chronic disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), this study aimed to assess the cost associated with RA in primary care within the Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland. MethodsFollowing mapping of the care pathway, patient vignettes based on exemplar RA patient types were used to conduct semi-structed interviews with every member (N = 21) of the primary care RA pathway. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) was then used to calculate the overall cost of each patient (vignette) type. ResultsRA is an expensive condition regardless of disease stage. However, newly diagnosed patients as well as those with advanced disease in need of surgical interventions demonstrated the highest costs in terms of primary care personnel use. Additionally, patients prescribed Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) cost significantly more than those on Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) regardless of disease stage or personnel resource use. ConclusionRA and a subset of RA patients that exert the highest healthcare costs are growing in prevalence. Therefore, this study contributes by assessing the costs associated with RA in HSE primary care that can facilitate better understanding the current value being provided and improve upon the current care pathway to cut future costs.

What is the Marginal Cost of Using Robot Assistance or Navigation for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis.

Our primary objective was to compare the marginal intraoperative cost of 3 different methods for pedicle screw placement as part of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). Specifically, we used time-driven activity-based costing to compare costs between robot-assisted TLIF (RA-TLIF), TLIF with intraoperative navigation (ION-TLIF), and freehand (non-navigated, nonrobotic) TLIF. Total cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. We identified all instances of RA-TLIF (n = 20), ION-TLIF (n = 59), and freehand TLIF (n = 233) from 2020 to 2022 at our institution. Software was developed to automate the extraction of all intraoperatively used personnel and material resources from the electronic medical record. Total costs were determined through a combination of direct observation, electronic medical record extraction, and interdepartmental collaboration (business operations, sterile processing, pharmacy, and plant operation departments). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare costs between TLIF modalities, accounting for patient-specific factors as well as number of levels fused, surgeon, and hospital site. The average total intraoperative cost per case for the RA-TLIF, ION-TLIF, and freehand TLIF cohorts was $24 838 ± $10 748, $15 991 ± $6254, and $14 498 ± $6580, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that RA-TLIF had significantly higher intraoperative cost compared with both ION-TLIF (β-coefficient: $7383 ± $1575, P < .001) and freehand TLIF (β-coefficient: $8182 ± $1523, P < .001). These cost differences were primarily driven by supply cost. However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative cost between ION-TLIF and freehand TLIF (P = .32). We demonstrate a novel use of time-driven activity-based costing methodology to compare different modalities for executing the same type of lumbar fusion procedure. RA-TLIF entails significantly higher supply cost when compared with other modalities, which explains its association with higher total intraoperative cost. The use of ION, however, does not add extra expense compared with freehand TLIF when accounting for confounders. This might have implications as surgeons and hospitals move toward bundled payments.

Does Body Mass Index Influence Intraoperative Costs and Operative Times for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

ObjectiveSpine surgeons are often unaware of drivers of cost variation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI), total cost, and OR times for ACDFs. MethodsTotal cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. Individual costs were obtained by direct observation, electronic medical records, and through querying multiple departments. Timestamps for all involved personnel and material resources were documented. Total intraoperative costs were estimated for all ACDFs from 2017 and 2022. All patients were categorized into distinct BMI-based cohorts. Linear regression models were performed to assess the relationship between BMI, total cost, and OR times. ResultsA total of 959 patients underwent ACDFs between 2017 and 2022. The average age and BMI were 58.1 ± 11.2 years and 30.2 ± 6.4 kg/m2, respectively. The average total intraoperative cost per case was $7,120 ± $2,963. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that BMI was not significantly associated with total cost (p=0.36), supply cost (p=0.39), or personnel cost (p=0.20). Higher BMI was significantly associated with increased time spent in the OR (p=0.018); however, it was not a significant factor for the duration of surgery itself (p=0.755). Rather, higher BMI was significantly associated with non-operative OR time (p<0.001). ConclusionTDABC is a feasible and scalable methodology for understanding the true intraoperative costs of ACDF. Although higher BMI was not associated with increased total cost, it was associated with increased preparatory time in the OR.

Surgeon idiosyncrasy is a key driver of cost in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a time-driven activity-based costing analysis.

Delivering high-value orthopedic care requires optimizing value, defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent. Published literature is stippled with inaccurate proxies for cost, including negotiated reimbursement rates, fees paid, or listed prices. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) offers a more robust and accurate approach to calculating cost, including shoulder care. In the present study, we sought to determine the drivers of total cost in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) using TDABC. Consecutive patients undergoing aRCR at multiple sites associated with a large urban health care system between January 2019 and September 2021 were identified. Total cost was determined using TDABC methodology. The episode of care was defined by 3 phases: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. Patient, procedure, rotator cuff tear morphology, and surgeon characteristics were collected. Bivariate analysis was performed across all characteristics between high-cost (top decile) and all other aRCRs. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify the key cost drivers. In total, 625 aRCRs performed by 24 orthopedic surgeons and 572 aRCRs performed by 13 orthopedic surgeons were included in the bivariate and multivariable linear regression analyses, respectively. By TDABC analysis, total aRCR cost varied 6-fold (5.9×) from least to most costly. Intraoperative costs accounted for 91% of average total cost, followed by preoperative costs and postoperative costs (6% and 3%, respectively). Biologic adjuncts (regression coefficient [RC] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.58, P<.001) and surgeon idiosyncrasy (RC of highest-cost surgeon 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.73, P<.001) were the major cost drivers in aRCR. Patient age, comorbidities, number of rotator cuff tendons torn, and revision surgery were not significantly associated with total cost. The amount of tendon retraction (RC 0.0012, 95% CI 0.000020-0.0024, P=.046), average Goutallier grade (RC 0.029, 95% CI 0.0086-0.049, P=.005), and the number of anchors used (RC 0.039, 95% CI 0.032-0.046, P < .001) were also significantly associated with cost, but with far smaller effect sizes. Episode of care costs vary nearly 6-fold in aRCR and are almost exclusively dictated by the intraoperative phase. Tear morphology and repair technique contribute to cost, although the largest cost drivers of aRCR are the use of biologic adjuncts and surgeon idiosyncrasy, defined as something a surgeon does or does not do that impacts total cost and is not controlled for in the current analysis. Future work should seek to better delineate what these surgeon idiosyncrasies may represent.

What is the Marginal Intraoperative Cost of Using an Exoscope or Operative Microscope for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

Our primary objective was to compare the marginal intraoperative cost of three different surgical visualization techniques for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Specifically, we used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology to compare costs between ACDFS performed with operative microscopes (OM-ACDF), exoscopes (EX-ACDF), and loupes (loupes-ACDF). Total cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. Individual costs were obtained by direct observation, electronic medical records, and through querying multiple departments (business operations, sterile processing, plant operations, and pharmacy). Timestamps for all involved personnel and material resources were documented. We identified all instances of loupes-ACDF (n=882), EX-ACDF (n=26), and OM-ACDF (n=52) performed at our institution. We performed multivariable linear regression analyses to compare costs between these modalities, accounting for patient-specific factors as well as number of levels fused, surgeon, and hospital site. The average total intraoperative costs per loupes-ACDF, EX-ACDF, and OM-ACDF cases were $7,081 +/- $2,942, $7,951 +/- $3,488, and $6,557 +/- $954, respectively. Regression analysis revealed no difference in intraoperative cost between loupes-ACDF and EX-ACDF (p=0.717), loupes-ACDF and OM-ACDF (0.954), or OM-ACDF and EX-ACDF (0.217). On a more granular level, however, EX-ACDF was associated with increased cost of consumables, including drapes, compared to both OM-ACDF (β-coefficient: $369 +/- $121, p=0.002) and loupes-ACDF (β-coefficient: $284 +/- $86, p=0.001). Although hospitals may be aware of the purchasing fees associated with microscopes and exoscopes, there is no clear documentation of how these technologies affect intraoperative cost. We demonstrate a novel use of TDABC for this purpose.

Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis Identifies Use of Consumables and Operating Room Time as Factors Associated With Increased Cost of Outpatient Primary Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair

To use time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology to 1) investigate drivers of cost variation and 2) elucidate preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with increased cost of outpatient arthroscopic hip labral repair. A retrospective analysis of data from January 2020 to October 2021 was performed. Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for labral repair in the outpatient setting were included. Indexed TDABC data from Avant-garde Health's analytics platform was used to represent cost-of-care breakdowns. Patients in the top decile of cost were defined as high-cost, and cost category variance was determined as a percent increase between high and low-cost. Analyses tested for associations between preoperative and perioperative factors with total cost. Surgical procedures performed concomitantly to labral repair were included in sub-analyses. Data from 151 patients were analyzed. Consumables made up 61% of total outpatient cost with surgical personnel costs (30%) being the second largest category. The average total cost was 19% higher for patients in the top decile of cost compared to the remainder of the cohort. Factors contributing to this difference were implants (36% higher), surgical personnel (20% higher), and operating room (OR) consumables (15% higher). Multivariate linear regression modeling indicated that OR time (Standardized β=0.504; p < 0.001) and anchor quantity (Standardized β=0.443; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of increased cost. Femoroplasty (Unstandardized β = 15.274; P = 0.010), chondroplasty (Unstandardized β = 8.860; P = 0.009), excision of Os Acetabuli (Unstandardized β = 13.619; P = 0.041), and trochanteric bursectomy (Unstandardized β = 21.176; P = 0.009) were also all independently associated with increasing operating time. TDABC analysis showed that OR consumables and implants were the largest drivers of cost for the procedure. OR time was also shown to be a significant predictor of increased costs. Level IV; Economic Analysis.

Same-Day Discharge vs Inpatient Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Complications, Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, and Patient Satisfaction.

Historically, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is accompanied by an inpatient hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to same-day discharge robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in some centers to free up critically needed inpatient beds. This study aims to compare complications, total health care costs, and patient satisfaction for same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. We compared 392 consecutive robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies performed as same-day discharge (n = 206) vs inpatient (n = 186) from February 2020 to November 2022 at 2 academic medical centers. We utilized propensity score analysis to assess the impact of same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on 30-day complications (primary outcome). Time-driven activity-based costing analysis was applied to compare total costs of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy care, and we administered a validated Patient Satisfaction Outcome Questionnaire to compare satisfaction scores. Inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy patients were more likely to be older, self-reported Black race or Hispanic ethnicity, and have higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Complication rates were nonsignificantly lower for same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.21; P = .8). Same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy demonstrated a $2106 (19%) overall cost reduction. Median satisfaction survey scores were similar, and a clinically significant difference can be excluded. Same-day discharge robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is cost-effective and should be the preferred approach in appropriately selected patients.

The Cost of Standard and Complex Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair Exceeds Its Reimbursement

To measure the total costs and reimbursements associated with standard and complex pars plana vitrectomy using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Economic analysis at a single academic institution. Patients who underwent standard or complex pars plana vitrectomy (PPV; Current Procedural Terminology codes 67108 and 67113) at the University of Michigan in the calendar year2021. Process flow mapping for standard and complex PPVs was used to determine the operative components. The internal anesthesia record system was used to calculate time estimates, and financial calculations were constructed from published literature and internal sources. A TDABC analysis was used to determine the costs of standard and complex PPVs. Average reimbursement was based on Medicare rates. The primary outcomes were the total costs for standard and complex PPVs and the resulting net margin at current Medicare reimbursement levels. The secondary outcomes were the differential in surgical times, costs, and margin for standard and complex PPV. Over the 2021 calendar year, a total of 270 standard and 142 complex PPVs were included in the analysis. Complex PPVs were associated with significantly increased anesthesia time (52.28 minutes; P < 0.001), operating room time (51.28 minutes; P < 0.0001), surgery time (43.64 minutes; P < 0.0001), and postoperative time (25.95 minutes; P < 0.0001). The total day-of-surgery costs were $5154.59 and $7852.38 for standard and complex PPVs, respectively. Postoperative visits incurred an additional cost of $327.84 and $353.86 for standard and complex PPV, respectively. The institution-specific facility payments were $4505.50 and $4935.14 for standard and complex PPV, respectively. Standard PPV yielded a net negative margin of-$976.93, whereas complex PPV yielded a net negative margin of-$3271.10. This analysis demonstrated that Medicare reimbursement is inadequate in covering the costs of PPV for retinal detachment, with a particularly large negative margin for more complex cases. These findings demonstrate that additional steps may be necessary to mitigate adverse economic incentives so that patients continue to have timely access to care to achieve optimal visual outcomes after retinal detachment. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

EE28 Identifying Factors Underlying Variation in the Cost of Acetabular Labral Repair or Debridement during Hip Arthroscopy: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

Leveraging time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), this study aims to (1) quantify the cost of arthroscopic acetabular labral repair or debridement and (2) explore variation in costs based on patient-specific characteristics, operative techniques employed, and surgical settings.

Time-driven Activity-based Costing Analysis of Fluorescein Angiography

To use electronic health record (EHR) time logs and time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to calculate the complete cost profile of office-based fluorescein angiography (FA). Economic analysis. Patients undergoing routine FA (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 92235) at Vanderbilt Eye Institute in fiscal year2022. Process flow mapping for routine FA was used to define the care episode after manual observation. Deidentified time logs were sourced from the EHR and all manually validated to calculate durations for each stage. The cost of materials was calculated from internal financial figures. Cost per minute for space, equipment, and personnel were based on internal figures. Published fluorescein costs were used for base-case analysis with scenario analysis based on a range of internal figures from pharmacy quotes. These inputs were used for a TDABC analysis. Time-driven activity-based costing of FA episode of care. Secondary scenario analyses focus on breakeven scenarios for key inputs, including medication costs RESULTS: Cost analysis of office-based FA resulted in an average total cost of $152.95 (nominal) per interpreted study per patient, which was $36.52 more than the maximum Medicare reimbursement for CPT 92235 in Mac Locality for Tennessee 10312 for fiscal year 2022 ($116.43; $76.11 [technical component] and $40.33 [physician component]). The negative contribution margin is strongly influenced by the cost of fluorescein, which comprises 39.8% of the episode costs, excluding overhead. The current analysis here shows that the recently increased cost of fluorescein has driven up the cost of office-based FA relative to the current maximum allowable Medicare reimbursement, leading to a negative contribution margin and financial loss. Given conservative cost estimates here, it is unlikely for profitability to be achieved without changes in the cost of fluorescein or increased reimbursement. These results may be informative for policy discussion regarding appropriate reimbursement for codes using injectable fluorescein. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Pediatric Outpatient Noncontrast Brain MRI: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis at Three U.S. Hospitals.

BACKGROUND. MRI utilization and the use of sedation or anesthesia for MRI have increased in children. Emerging alternative payment models (APMs) require a detailed understanding of the health system costs of performing these examinations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to assess health system costs for outpatient noncontrast brain MRI examinations across three children's hospitals. METHODS. Direct costs for outpatient noncontrast brain MRI examinations at three academic free-standing pediatric hospitals were calculated using TDABC. Examinations were categorized as sedated MRI (i.e., sedation or anesthesia), nonsedated MRI, or limited MRI. Process maps were created to describe patient workflows based on input from key personnel and direct observation. Time durations for each process activity were determined; time stamps from retrospective EMR review were used when possible. Capacity cost rates were calculated for resource types within three cost categories (labor, equipment, and space); cost was calculated in a fourth category (supplies). Resources were allocated to each activity, and the cost of each process step was determined by multiplying step-specific capacity costs by the time required for each step. The costs of all steps were summed to yield a base-case total examination cost. Sensitivity analysis for sedated MRI was performed using minimum and maximum time duration inputs for each activity to yield minimum and maximum costs by hospital. RESULTS. The mean base-case cost for a sedated brain MRI examination was $842 (range, $775-924 across hospitals), for a nonsedated brain MRI examination was $262 (range, $240-285), and for a limited brain MRI examination was $135 (range, $127-141). For all examination types, the largest cost category as well as the largest source of difference in cost between hospitals was labor. Sensitivity analysis found that the greatest influence on overall cost at each hospital was the duration of the MRI acquisition. CONCLUSION. The health system cost of performing a sedated MRI examination was substantially greater than that of performing a nonsedated MRI examination. However, the cost of each individual examination type did not vary substantially among hospitals. CLINICAL IMPACT. Health systems operating within APMs can use this comparative cost information for purposes of cost reduction efforts and establishment of bundled prices.

Comparison of COVID-19 hospitalization costs across care pathways: a patient-level time-driven activity-based costing analysis in a Brazilian hospital

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic raised awareness of the need to better understand where and how patient-level costs are incurred in health care organizations, as health managers and other decision-makers need to plan and quickly adapt to the increasing demand for health care services to meet patients’ care needs. Time-driven activity-based costing offers a better understanding of the drivers of cost throughout the care pathway, providing information that can guide decisions on process improvement and resource optimization. This study aims to estimate COVID-19 patient-level hospital costs and to evaluate cost variability considering the in-hospital care pathways of COVID-19 management and the patient clinical classification.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study that applied time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) in a Brazilian reference center for COVID-19. Patients hospitalized during the first wave of the disease were selected for their data to be analyzed to estimate in-hospital costs. The cost information was calculated at the patient level and stratified by hospital care pathway and Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI) category. Multivariable analyses were applied to identify predictors of cost variability in the care pathways that were evaluated.ResultsA total of 208 patients were included in the study. Patients followed five different care pathways, of which Emergency + Ward was the most followed (n = 118, 57%). Pathways which included the intensive care unit presented a statistically significant influence on costs per patient (p <  0.001) when compared to Emergency + Ward. The median cost per patient was I$2879 (IQR 1215; 8140) and mean cost per patient was I$6818 (SD 9043). The most expensive care pathway was the ICU only, registering a median cost per patient of I$13,519 (IQR 5637; 23,373) and mean cost per patient of I$17,709 (SD 16,020). All care pathways that included the ICU unit registered a higher cost per patient.ConclusionsThis is one of the first microcosting study for COVID-19 that applied the TDABC methodology and demonstrated how patient-level costs vary as a function of the care pathways followed by patients. These findings can be used to develop value reimbursement strategies that will inform sustainable health policies in middle-income countries such as Brazil.

Costs of Newly Funded Proton Therapy Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in The Netherlands.

Proton therapy (PT) has characteristics that enable the sparing of healthy, non-cancerous tissue surrounding the radiotherapy target volume better from radiation doses than conventional radiotherapy for patients with cancer. While this innovation entails investment costs, the information about the treatment costs per patient, especially during the start-up phase, is limited. This study aims to calculate the costs of PT at a single center during the start-up phase in the Netherlands. The cost of PT per patient was estimated for the treatment indications, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, brain cancer, thorax cancer, chordoma and eye melanoma. A time-driven activity-based costing analysis (TDABC), a methodology that calculates the costs of consumed healthcare resources by a patient, was conducted in a newly established PT center in the Netherlands (HPTC). Both direct (e.g., the human resource costs for medical staff) and indirect costs (e.g., the operating/interest costs, indirect human resource costs and depreciation costs) were included. A scenario analysis was conducted for short-term (2021), middle-term (till 2024) and long-term (after 2024) predicted patient numbers in the PT center. The total cost of PT in 2020 at the center varied between EUR 12,062 for an eye melanoma course and EUR 89,716 for a head and neck course. Overall, indirect costs were the largest cost component. The high indirect costs implied the potential of the scale of economics; according to our estimation, the treatment cost could be reduced to 35% of the current cost when maximum treatment capacity is achieved. This study estimated the PT cost delivered in a newly operated treatment center. Scenario analysis for increased patient numbers revealed the potential for cost reductions. Nevertheless, to have an estimation that reflects the matured cost of PT which could be used in cost-effectiveness analysis, a follow-up study assessing the full-fledged situation is recommended.

Improved hospital discharge and cost savings with esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation

BackgroundLeft atrial ablation to obtain pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a technologically intensive procedure utilizing innovative and continually improving technology. Changes in the technology utilized for PVI can in turn lead to changes in procedure costs. Because of the proximity of the esophagus to the posterior wall of the left atrium, various technologies have been utilized to protect against thermal injury during ablation. The impact on hospital costs during PVI ablation from utilization of different technologies for esophageal protection during ablation has not previously been evaluated.ObjectiveTo compare the costs of active esophageal cooling to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during left atrial ablation.MethodsWe performed a time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis to determine costs for PVI procedures. Published data and literature review were utilized to determine differences in procedure time and same-day discharge rates using different esophageal protection technologies and to determine the cost impacts of same-day discharge versus overnight hospitalization after PVI procedures. The total costs were then compared between cases using active esophageal cooling to those using LET monitoring.ResultsThe effect of implementing active esophageal cooling was associated with up to a 24.7% reduction in mean total procedure time, and an 18% increase in same-day discharge rate. TDABC analysis identified a $681 reduction in procedure costs associated with the use of active esophageal cooling after including the cost of the esophageal cooling device. Factoring in the 18% increase in same-day discharge resulted in an increased cost savings of $2,135 per procedure.ConclusionsThe use of active esophageal cooling is associated with significant cost-savings when compared to traditional LET monitoring, even after accounting for the additional cost of the cooling device. These savings originate from a per-patient procedural time savings and a per-population improvement in same-day discharge rate.

A time-driven activity-based costing analysis of motion analysis in adult spinal deformity

A time-driven activity-based costing analysis of motion analysis in adult spinal deformity

COVID-19 and hospital management costs: the Italian experience

BackgroundThis article investigates the hospital costs related to the management of COVID-19 positive patients, requiring a hospitalization (from the positivity confirmation to discharge, including rehabilitation activities).MethodsA time-driven activity-based costing analysis, grounding on administrative and accounting flows provided by the management control, was implemented to define costs related to the hospital management of COVID-19 positive patients, according to real-word data, derived from six public Italian Hospitals, in 2020.ResultsResults reported that the higher the complexity of care, the higher the hospitalization cost per day (low-complexity = €475.86; medium-complexity = €700.20; high-complexity = €1,401.65). Focusing on the entire clinical pathway, the overall resources absorption, with the inclusion of rehabilitation costs, ranged from 6,198.02€ to 32,141.20€, dependent from the patient’s clinical condition.ConclusionsData could represent the baseline cost for COVID-19 hospital management, thus being useful for the further development of proper reimbursement tariffs devoted to hospitalized infected patients.

Hospital Costs, Revenue, and Abuse Detection Associated With Occult Injury Screening.

Performance of occult injury screening including skeletal surveys and neuroimaging is recommended to comprehensively evaluate suspected child physical abuse. Screening performance-associated hospital costs and net revenue for care of index abuse victims and siblings/household contacts are largely unknown. We aimed to describe 1) costs and net revenue associated with radiologic occult injury screening at an urban level 1 pediatric trauma center, 2) areas of perceived high resource intensity (time spent in abuse victim-related care), and 3) detection yield among children undergoing occult injury screening and physical assessment. Using time-driven activity-based cost analysis, hospital, per physician, staff, and radiology costs associated with occult injury screening performance were mapped for 199 children <2 years old. Hospital costs and resource times were approximated and compared with net revenue for each healthcare encounter. Abstracted variables included index/sibling status, injury classification, and length of stay (LOS). Of 199 children with variable LOS (0-45 days), total hospital costs (facility, physician, staff, radiology) ranged $297.83 to $81,474; net revenue was positive. Total ED time per abuse case varied 32 to 1823 minutes; social work (SW) time ranged 44 to 720 minutes; prolonged ED/SW time represented resource-intense areas. Of siblings, 27% were diagnosed with unanticipated findings based on occult injury screening and examination. At a single center, occult injury screening was associated with cost variability, resource intensity, and enhanced victim identification when external examination findings or clinical symptoms were absent. While further study is needed, cost and resource concerns associated with screening may be offset by societal benefit and minimal hospital-based financial losses.

Investigation of Isotoxic Dose Escalation and Plan Quality with TDABC Analysis on a 0.35 T MR-Linac (MRL) System in Ablative 5-Fraction Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT) for Primary Pancreatic Cancer.

This study investigates plan quality generated by an MR-Linac (MRL) treatment planning system (TPS) for 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of primary pancreatic cancer (PCa). In addition, an isotoxic dose escalation was investigated with the MRL TPS based on stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) trial constraints. A clinical workflow was developed for adaptive and non-adaptive treatments with the MRL, on which a time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis was performed to quantify clinical efficacy. Fifteen PCa patients previously treated with a conventional Linac were retrospectively re-planned for this study. Three plans were generated for each patient using the original prescription dose (PD) and organ at risk (OAR) constraints (Plan 1), following SMART trial’s OAR constraints but with the original PD (Plan 2), starting with Plan 2, following an isotoxic dose escalation strategy where the dose was escalated until any one of the SMART trial’s OAR constraints reached its limit (Plan 3). Conformity index (CI) and the ratio of the 50% isodose volume to PTV (R50%) conformity metrics were calculated for all 45 MRL plans, in addition to standard dose-volume indices. Forty-five MRL plans were created which met their respective dosimetric criteria described above. For Plan 1, the MRL TPS successfully achieved equivalent or lower OAR doses while maintaining the prescribed PTV coverage for the 15 plans. A maximum dose to the small bowel was reduced on average by 4.97 Gy (range: 1.11–10.58 Gy). For Plan 2, the MRL TPS successfully met all SMART trial OAR constraints while maintaining equivalent PTV coverage. For Plan 3, the MRL TPS was able to escalate the prescription dose from the original 25–33 Gy by, on average, 36 Gy (range: 15–70 Gy), and dose to the PTV was successfully escalated to at least 50 Gy for all 15 plans. These achievements were made possible, in part, due to the omission of the ITV afforded by the MRL’s real-time target tracking technology and sharper dose penumbra due to its unique dual-focus MLC design. The 0.35T MRL TPS can generate plans that are equivalent to conventional Linac-based plans for SBRT of PCa. Through analyzing Plan 2 and 3 strategies, and due to the real-time target localization capabilities of the MRL system, increased OAR sparing and/or target dose escalation are possible.

External Fixation Characteristics Drive Cost of Care for High-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures.

To determine the total cost for a 30-day episode of care for high-energy tibial plateau fractures and the aspects of care associated with total cost. Time-driven activity-based costing analysis. One Level 1 adult trauma center. One hundred twenty-one patients with isolated, bicondylar tibial plateau fractures undergoing staged treatment were reviewed. Total cost. A total of 85 patients were included and most sustained Schatzker VI fractures (n = 66, 77%). All patients were treated with biplanar external fixation before definitive fixation. A total of 26 patients (31%) were discharged to skilled nursing facilities, and 37 patients (43%) were not discharged between procedures. Total cost for a 30-day episode of care was $22,113 ± 4056. External fixation components ($5952, 26.9%), length of hospital stay ($5606, 25.4%), discharge to skilled nursing facility (SNF) ($3061, 13.8%), and definitive fixation implants ($2968, 13.4%) contributed to the total cost. The following were associated with total cost: patient discharged to SNFs (P < 0.001), patient remaining inpatient after external fixation (P < 0.001), days of admission for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (P = 0.005), days spent with external fixation (P < 0.001), days in a SNF after ORIF (P < 0.001), and external fixation component cost (P < 0.001). External fixation component selection is the largest contributor to cost of a 30-day episode of care for high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Reduction in cost variability may be possible through thoughtful use of external fixation components and care pathways. Economic analyses Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis of Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundAlthough studies have compared the claims costs of simultaneous and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether a simultaneous procedure is cost-effective to the facility remains unknown. This study aimed to compare facility costs and perioperative outcomes of simultaneous vs staged bilateral THA and TKA. MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 560 bilateral THA (170 staged and 220 simultaneous) and 777 bilateral TKA (163 staged and 451 simultaneous). Itemized facility costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing. Ninety-day outcomes were compared. Margin was standardized to unadjusted Medicare Diagnosis Related Group payments (simultaneous, $18,523; staged, $22,386). Multivariate regression was used to determine the independent association between costs/clinical outcomes and treatment strategy (staged vs simultaneous). ResultsSimultaneous bilateral patients had significantly lower personnel, supply, and total facility costs compared with staged patients with no difference in 90-day complications between the groups. Multivariate analyses showed that overall facility costs were $1,210 lower in simultaneous bilateral THA (P < .001) and $704 lower in TKA (P < .001). Despite lower costs, margin for the facility was lower in the simultaneous group ($6,569 vs $9,225 for THA; $6,718 vs $10,067 for TKA; P < .001). ConclusionSimultaneous bilateral TKA and THA had lower facility costs than staged procedures because of savings associated with a single hospitalization. With the increased Medicare reimbursement for 2 unilateral procedures, however, margin was higher for staged procedures. In the era of value-based care, policymakers should not penalize facilities for performing cost-effective simultaneous bilateral arthroplasty in appropriately selected patients.